Toying with the “donation” block

Please humor me while I play with the WordPress block for accepting donations from website visitors.

If you happened to see a version of this test that I accidentally published a little while ago, I apologize for that unnecessary notification. (Not that this one is really necessary, but it seems to happen when we post something, right?)

While we’re here, if you’ve used the WP block or something similar yourself and found it worthwhile, I would appreciate hearing about it. Also while we’re here, I thought I’d share an image I put together with Inkscape just now and a new arrangement of words I published just the other day on my nearby Rhyme & verse page.

Regards,

B.J.

One-Time
Monthly
Yearly

Make a one-time donation

Make a monthly donation

Make a yearly donation

Choose an amount

$2.00
$5.00
$10.00
$5.00
$15.00
$100.00
$5.00
$15.00
$100.00

Or enter a custom amount

$

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

Your contribution is appreciated.

DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly

AI for authors a hard no

An article from The Verge that Phil Tobias shared on LinkedIn the other day jumped out at me, as his posts often do.

How Kindle novelists are using ChatGPT

I’ve never thought of myself as a “Kindle novelist” but I do have some novels for sale as Kindle ebooks, so I guess that’s one identity I can claim. I’ve also been paying attention to developments in the use of artificial intelligence (aka AI) and its growing impact on society. The “ChatGPT” in the headline has been mentioned in more articles* than I can count lately. 

The article at the big link above is an interesting interview with a writer who uses AI but is not entirely comfortable doing that, and for good reason. One sentence in particular caught my attention, a question that I answered almost immediately.

“Should authors have to disclose their use of AI?”

Yes.

Easy for me to say, right? As much as I think it is the right thing for a writer to do, it isn’t likely to happen at scale. Some writers and editors I’ve encountered, and many other people who have been exposed nationally and internationally as plagiarists, won’t hesitate to use AI that scrapes the internet for the intellectual property of others only to mimic it and sell their own pilfered prose. Too many writers won’t see the harm.

Seeing no practical way to require authors to disclose their use of AI, I’m suggesting another approach for writers who want to make clear that their creative work is not AI-assisted or enhanced: Mark your work, your published books, your blogs, your author pages, everything you write with an easy to spot Non-AI label.

I, for one, will be more likely to take you seriously.

If you’re inclined to think what I wrote above is an attack on AI in general, think again. It is about protecting your own intellectual property rights. AI has tremendous potential for both good and bad. Examples just below.

Write on, my friends.

B.J.


* See this Medium article by Jeff Jarvis, CUNY Newmark School journalism professor. In that article, he writes about the potential AI has for improving literacy and people’s ability to communicate, and much more. And here’s another example of how AI can be used to help people.

Write it yourself

Shortly after I told my teacher son that I’m concerned about people using AI and pretending to create original content, I found a site that epitomizes the phenomenon.

I won’t link to it, for reasons I hope are obvious, but it uses almost the exact wording I’d spoken just minutes before, admitting that its service is just the thing *for people who have no ideas* but want to blog about something.

It will also “paraphrase” any sentence you want it to rewrite, presumably to make your plagiarism harder to detect.

If an idea does come around, write about it yourself, in your own human, original way. Using the work of others to create something to call your own isn’t writing.

B.J.

Burning down the…

Leaving the bird app behind after having some fun from 2008-2022. Pixabay image.

The Smith Compound crew will celebrate on New Year’s Eve* by torching not one but two Twitter accounts.

You can find me/us here at the SC, of course, as well as on Mastodon, or fishing some lake or stream, or out and about on a bicycle, or on a hike, or maybe in a fun brewpub over a fine red ale.

Those who know me best will be able to find me on my day job through May 1, 2023.

I hope we’ll stay in touch after the NYE fire and well beyond, one way or another, for real or only in my dreams.

Regards,
B.J.

* 12/19/2022: All things considered, this may happen sooner than NYE.

Dogs and writing

A few days ago I ran across the following sentence and felt compelled to respond: “Writing is something you do, not something you are.”

It was among a good number of well-written sentences that added up to some good advice, but it stood out, and not just because it’s a bit awkward. It came to mind again when the first thing I saw on my phone this morning was that someone liked something I wrote back in February.

Who doesn’t enjoy a like? I went back in time to February to read that post and see what was likeable about it. Turns out it was about my dog, and the conversations we have, and why I write stuff.

This is what happens when you are a writer, despite some who say writing is something you do, but not something you can be. She was wrong about that part.

Dog pictures always seem to get likes, so now you see Red Dog Smith.

Red Dog facing the camera, with text overlaid in red type saying “I have questions.”

Maybe you’ll enjoy reading about him. I just happen to have a link. 👇👇👇